North StarTarget ArchitectureMeeting Evidence

Arsitektur North Star

Penjelasan khusus tentang referensi Arsitektur North Star dari video workshop Lumen, menggunakan diagram asli sebagai bukti dan menerjemahkannya menjadi posisi untuk Architecture Commit.

Kalimat presentasi: Arsitektur North Star adalah arah target operating model dan sistem Lumen. LumenVision/OneVizion sebaiknya mendukung arah ini sebagai layer workflow dan orchestration sambil tetap menjaga ownership otoritatif di domain systems.

Arti North Star Di Konteks Ini

Ini adalah target ecosystem

North Star bukan satu aplikasi. Ini adalah landscape future-state untuk product ordering, service order, network implementation, inventory, workforce, SAP, data hub, eventing, reporting, dan AI-assisted operations.

Ini adalah arah migrasi

Workshop memposisikan BAU sebagai perpindahan menuju North Star sambil exit atau mengurangi ketergantungan pada pola legacy seperti Netbuild, Armor, WFMT, SiteTracker, dan sebagian penggunaan Flight Deck.

Ini membutuhkan ownership yang jelas

Pertanyaan Architecture Commit terpenting bukan apakah LumenVision bisa menampilkan pekerjaan. Pertanyaannya adalah sistem mana yang memiliki setiap object, event, date, status, task, inventory item, BOM, dan exception.

Ini harus dilakukan bertahap

Commitment yang lebih aman adalah bertahap: buktikan workflow Release 1 yang bounded, definisikan integration contract, lindungi BAU, lalu perluas orchestration dan AI setelah data foundation dipercaya.

Diagram Utama Dari Video

Video 1 00:11:19

Target Ecosystem / Northstar Context

This is the clearest starting diagram. It frames North Star as a broader target ecosystem across product ordering, service order management, network implementation, inventory, workforce, SAP, data hub, and integration. LumenVision/OneVizion should fit into this landscape as the work orchestration layer, not as a replacement for every authoritative system.

Video 2 00:03:21

Arsitektur North Star And Network Implementation Requirements

This diagram connects North Star direction to network implementation requirements. It shows why Architecture Commit cannot stop at a UI/workflow discussion: the solution must define order flow, BPI/network work, task execution, reporting, and integration boundaries.

Video 5 00:29:02

Northstar / Integration Strategy

This is the strategy bridge from roadmap to execution. It supports a staged path: begin with bounded workflows such as Waves or Dark Fiber, use light integration where needed, and evolve toward deeper ownership and automation only after object model and integration contracts are clear.

Cara Menjelaskannya Ke Lumen

Start by saying North Star is the target architecture direction, not a single replacement system.
Position LumenVision/OneVizion as the orchestration and work-management surface inside that architecture.
Use the System of Record Matrix to avoid overclaiming source-of-truth ownership.
Use the Inventaris Integrasi to show which APIs, events, Kafka headers, replay, DLQ, and write-back contracts must be committed.
Recommend a bounded Release 1 anchor so Architecture Commit can approve real scope without pretending the full future state is already solved.

Pertanyaan Terbuka Untuk Architecture Commit

Which workflow proves North Star best for Release 1: Service Delivery, SiteTracker exit, Network Grooms, Waves, Dark Fiber, or another priority?
Which objects does LumenVision own versus only orchestrate or display?
Which legacy exits are deadline-driven migration, and which are deeper transformation?
What Kafka/CFKA headers, event contracts, replay, and exception-handling rules are mandatory before build?
What is the mid-July/mid-August commit expectation: concept approval, target architecture, integration inventory, or implementation-ready design?