North Star Mimarisi
Lumen workshop videolarindaki North Star Mimarisi referanslarini aciklayan, gercek diagramlari kanit olarak kullanan ve bunu Architecture Commit pozisyonuna ceviren sayfa.
Bu Kontekste North Star Ne Demek
Bu bir target ecosystem
North Star tek bir application degildir. Product ordering, service order, network implementation, inventory, workforce, SAP, data hub, eventing, reporting ve AI-assisted operations icin future-state landscape’tir.
Bu bir migration direction
Workshop’larda BAU, Netbuild, Armor, WFMT, SiteTracker ve secili Flight Deck kullanimi gibi legacy pattern’lerden cikarken North Star’a hareket etmek olarak anlatiliyor.
Net ownership gerektirir
En onemli Architecture Commit sorusu LumenVision’in isi gosterebilmesi degil; her object, event, date, status, task, inventory item, BOM ve exception’in sahibi hangi sistem sorusudur.
Asamali ilerlemelidir
Daha guvenli commitment asamalidir: bounded Release 1 workflow’u kanitla, integration contract’lari tanimla, BAU’yu koru, data foundation guvenilir oldugunda daha derin orchestration ve AI’a genislet.
Videolardan Ana Diagramlar
Target Ecosystem / Northstar Context
This is the clearest starting diagram. It frames North Star as a broader target ecosystem across product ordering, service order management, network implementation, inventory, workforce, SAP, data hub, and integration. LumenVision/OneVizion should fit into this landscape as the work orchestration layer, not as a replacement for every authoritative system.
North Star Mimarisi And Network Implementation Requirements
This diagram connects North Star direction to network implementation requirements. It shows why Architecture Commit cannot stop at a UI/workflow discussion: the solution must define order flow, BPI/network work, task execution, reporting, and integration boundaries.
Northstar / Integration Strategy
This is the strategy bridge from roadmap to execution. It supports a staged path: begin with bounded workflows such as Waves or Dark Fiber, use light integration where needed, and evolve toward deeper ownership and automation only after object model and integration contracts are clear.
Lumen’e Nasil Anlatilir
- Start by saying North Star is the target architecture direction, not a single replacement system.
- Position LumenVision/OneVizion as the orchestration and work-management surface inside that architecture.
- Use the System of Record Matrix to avoid overclaiming source-of-truth ownership.
- Use the Entegrasyon Envanteri to show which APIs, events, Kafka headers, replay, DLQ, and write-back contracts must be committed.
- Recommend a bounded Release 1 anchor so Architecture Commit can approve real scope without pretending the full future state is already solved.
Architecture Commit Icin Acik Sorular
- Which workflow proves North Star best for Release 1: Service Delivery, SiteTracker exit, Network Grooms, Waves, Dark Fiber, or another priority?
- Which objects does LumenVision own versus only orchestrate or display?
- Which legacy exits are deadline-driven migration, and which are deeper transformation?
- What Kafka/CFKA headers, event contracts, replay, and exception-handling rules are mandatory before build?
- What is the mid-July/mid-August commit expectation: concept approval, target architecture, integration inventory, or implementation-ready design?