Statik HTML Paylasim Sayfasi

LumenVision / OneVizion Architecture Commit

Proje baglamina, musteriye yonelik onerilere, architecture diagramina ve destekleyici dokumanlara ihtiyac duyan ekip arkadaslari icin tarayicida acilabilen bir bilgilendirme sayfasi.

Okumaya Basla Tam POV Ac Gorsel Kanit Indeksi

Yonetici Ozeti

Lumen is using Architecture Commit to decide whether LumenVision, delivered with OneVizion, can move from concept into funded solutioning and development. The formal path is concept -> architecture commit -> development, with the next major decision window around mid-August.

Lumen Ne Istiyor

A more unified way to manage network implementation across planning, service delivery, construction, grooms, order management, legacy-tool exits, field execution, reporting, and future AI-assisted operations.

Onerilen Pozisyon

Position LumenVision / OneVizion as the structured workflow and orchestration layer, while preserving clear source-of-truth ownership in existing domain systems.

Dikkatli Commit

Approve target principles, Release 1 scope, system boundaries, integration contracts, migration approach, and value case. Avoid broad claims that one tool owns every object immediately.

Onerilen Okuma Sirasi

Projeye yeni baslayan biri icin onerilen sira budur. Bu alfabetik dosya sirasi degil; once musteri hikayesi, sonra architecture, sonra video kanitlari, en son appendix.

Musteri Cozum POV Ile Basla

Lumen'e oneriyi ve konusma seklini anlamak icin bunu oku.

Musteri Cozum POV Ac

Architecture Diagram Ve Soru Cevabi Incele

Target system yapisini ve gelebilecek musteri sorularini anlamak icin bunu kullan.

Soru Cevap Ve Diagram Ac

Architecture Commit Hazirlik Paketini Oku

Decision matrix, risk, talking points ve commit scope icin bunu kullan.

Hazirlik Paketini Ac

Videolari Meeting Sirasiyla Kanit Olarak Kullan

Konsept netlestikten sonra insight'larin nereden geldigini session sirasi ile takip et.

Video Diagramlarini Ac

Customer Gorusmesi Oncesi Vocabulary Hizala

Acronym, sistem, ownership terimleri ve integration pattern konularini tutarli anlatmak icin sozlugu kullan.

Sozlugu Ac

Appendix'e Sadece Gerektiginde Git

Ownership veya interface sorulari geldiginde matrix ve inventory kullan.

Sistem Matrisi Ac   |   Entegrasyon Envanteri Ac

Video Kanit Sirasi

Evet: video kanitlari meeting/video sirasini takip eder. Once cozum yolunu oku, sonra Video 1'den Video 6'ya kanitlari incele.

OrderMeeting / VideoWhy It Matters
Video 1Lumen, June 30, 2026Target ecosystem, planning request, inventory consolidation, and source-of-truth concerns.
Video 2Alignment Lumen 2, June 30, 2026Network-initiated order management, workflow journeys, BPI, Flight Deck, ByFrost, and reporting assumptions.
Video 3Lumen alignment 3, July 1, 2026OneVizion roadmap, AI/ADO, trusted data foundation, Kafka/CFKA, and governance.
Video 4Lumen alignment 4, July 1, 2026Platform capabilities: tasks, dashboards, roles, documents, templates, and AI concepts.
Video 5Lumen Alignment 5, July 1, 2026Transformation roadmap, terminology, SAP, BluePlanet, GLM/3GIS, WFM, Salesforce/NEO.
Video 5.2Lumen 5.2, July 2, 2026Custom Networks, BAU, FT3, LTO PMO, integrations, SiteTracker exit, Kafka 2.0, and phasing.
Video 6Lumen alignment vid 6, July 2, 2026Delivery governance, testing, UAT, integration expertise, terminology, backlog, and readiness.

Lumen Action Items

  • Decide relative priority and path forward for the Service Delivery module.
  • Decide SiteTracker exit priority, timing, and risk.
  • Finalize roadmap and target execution plan.
  • Prepare content for Concept and Architecture Commit.
  • Define system flow for Network Grooms and next steps.
  • Prioritize follow-up items with clear owners.

Onerilen Target Architecture

The diagram below shows the core recommendation: LumenVision becomes the work surface and orchestration layer, while source-of-truth ownership remains distributed by domain. Kafka/CFKA connects state changes and supports traceability, replay, and exception handling. 

flowchart LR
    subgraph Intake["Demand / Order Intake"]
        SF["Salesforce / NEO"]
        SOM["SOM 2.0 / BlueSteel"]
        EXT["Partner / Portal / API"]
    end

    subgraph WorkSurface["LumenVision / OneVizion"]
        LV["Workflow, Planning, Task Visibility"]
        ADO["AI / ADO
Human-Supervised Tavsiyes"]
    end

    subgraph DomainSystems["Authoritative Domain Systems"]
        BPI["BPI
Network Order / Design"]
        BP["BluePlanet / VoltRon
Inventory Direction"]
        GIS["GLM / 3GIS
Site, Route, Survey"]
        SAP["SAP S/4HANA
BOM, Materials, Capital"]
        WFM["WFM / SFS / Flight Deck
Field Execution"]
    end

    subgraph DataLayer["Integration / Data / Reporting"]
        KAFKA["Kafka / CFKA
Events, Headers, Replay, DLQ"]
        HUB["Data Hub
Read-Side Stitched View"]
        RPT["INID / Dashboards
Operational Reporting"]
    end

    EXT --> SF
    SF --> SOM
    SOM --> KAFKA
    KAFKA --> LV
    LV --> BPI
    LV --> WFM
    LV --> SAP
    BPI --> KAFKA
    BP --> KAFKA
    GIS --> KAFKA
    SAP --> KAFKA
    WFM --> KAFKA
    KAFKA --> HUB
    HUB --> LV
    HUB --> RPT
    LV --> ADO
    KAFKA --> ADO
    ADO --> LV

Asamali Roadmap

Phase Odak Tavsiye
Phase 0 Commit readiness Finalize value statements, context diagram, object ownership matrix, integration inventory, Release 1 scope, and business case.
Phase 1 Foundation release Implement priority workflows with clear object ownership, Kafka/CFKA traceability, task/status sync, and reporting reconciliation.
Phase 2 Migration and exits Use a hybrid approach for SiteTracker, Netbuild, Armor, and Flight Deck/WFMT: deadline-safe migration first, deeper transformation second.
Phase 3 Domain integration depth Expand SAP, BluePlanet, GLM/3GIS, and WFM/SFS write-back only where ownership and rollback/replay behavior are agreed.
Phase 4 AI-assisted operations Start with recommendations, exception handling, and next-best-action support. Move to automation only after governance is proven.

Musteri Sorulari

  1. Is the approval request a full architecture submission or a partial concept-to-architecture gate?
  2. Which workflow must be the Release 1 anchor: Service Delivery, SiteTracker exit, Network Grooms, RNI, Waves/Dark Fiber, or another priority?
  3. Which systems must remain authoritative for order, inventory, materials, field task, date, and reporting state?
  4. What minimum integration set is required to prove value by the mid-August decision window?
  1. Is SiteTracker exit primarily deadline-driven migration, target-state transformation, or both?
  2. What value statements will be accepted as enough for STEPn resource approval?
  3. What production-readiness evidence is required: UAT, rollback, replay, observability, support model, or security review?

Detailed Dokumanlar

These links open directly as browser-friendly HTML pages in the same folder or GitHub repository. The Source notes remain in the repo, but colleagues can stay entirely in HTML from this page.

Musteri Cozum Bakis Acisi Best starting point for a customer-facing recommendation. Architecture Commit Hazirlik Paketi Short decision-ready brief for your Architecture Commit role. Soru Cevap Ve Diagram Likely customer questions, objection handling, and architecture explanation. System-Of-Record Matrisi Draft object ownership and write-authority matrix. Entegrasyon Envanteri Draft source/target integration list and Release 1 candidates. Slide Taslagi Suggested presentation flow and speaking notes. Visual Frame Index Extracted architecture screenshots from the meeting recordings.

Dil Packages

Onerilen Musteri Mesaji

“Our recommendation is to move forward with LumenVision as the structured workflow and orchestration layer, but to make the Architecture Commit precise. We should approve the target architecture principles, Release 1 scope, object ownership, integration contracts, roadmap, and value case. We should not make a blanket source-of-truth claim for every object.”