Pagina HTML estatica

Architecture Commit de LumenVision / OneVizion

Un briefing facil de abrir en navegador para colegas que necesitan contexto del proyecto, recomendacion para cliente, diagrama de arquitectura y documentos de soporte sin abrir una aplicacion Markdown separada.

Empezar Abrir POV Completo Indice Visual

Resumen Ejecutivo

Lumen is using Architecture Commit to decide whether LumenVision, delivered with OneVizion, can move from concept into funded solutioning and development. The formal path is concept -> architecture commit -> development, with the next major decision window around mid-August.

Lo Que Necesita Lumen

A more unified way to manage network implementation across planning, service delivery, construction, grooms, order management, legacy-tool exits, field execution, reporting, and future AI-assisted operations.

Posicion Recomendada

Position LumenVision / OneVizion as the structured workflow and orchestration layer, while preserving clear source-of-truth ownership in existing domain systems.

Commit Con Precision

Approve target principles, Release 1 scope, system boundaries, integration contracts, migration approach, and value case. Avoid broad claims that one tool owns every object immediately.

Orden De Lectura Recomendado

Este es el orden recomendado para alguien nuevo en el proyecto. No es orden alfabetico ni solo orden de archivos. Empieza con la historia para cliente, despues arquitectura, despues evidencia por videos, y al final apendices.

Empieza Con El POV De Solucion Para Cliente

Usa esto para entender la recomendacion y como explicarla a Lumen.

Abrir POV De Solucion

Revisa El Diagrama Y Preguntas

Usa esto para entender la arquitectura objetivo y posibles preguntas del cliente.

Abrir Q&A Y Diagrama

Lee El Architecture Commit Paquete Prep

Usa esto para decision matrix, riesgos, talking points y commit scope.

Abrir Paquete Prep

Usa Los Videos Como Evidencia En Orden De Reuniones

Cuando el concepto este claro, sigue la secuencia de sesiones para ver de donde salieron los insights.

Abrir Diagramas De Video

Alinear Vocabulary Antes De Hablar Con Customer

Usa el glosario para explicar acronimos, sistemas, terminos de ownership e integration patterns de forma consistente.

Abrir Glosario

Ve A Apendices Solo Cuando Sea Necesario

Usa matrix e inventory cuando haya preguntas de ownership o interfaces.

Abrir Matriz De Sistemas   |   Abrir Inventario De Integracion

Orden De Evidencia Por Video

Si: la evidencia sigue la secuencia de reuniones/videos. Primero entiende la solucion; despues revisa Video 1 hasta Video 6.

OrderMeeting / VideoWhy It Matters
Video 1Lumen, June 30, 2026Target ecosystem, planning request, inventory consolidation, and source-of-truth concerns.
Video 2Alignment Lumen 2, June 30, 2026Network-initiated order management, workflow journeys, BPI, Flight Deck, ByFrost, and reporting assumptions.
Video 3Lumen alignment 3, July 1, 2026OneVizion roadmap, AI/ADO, trusted data foundation, Kafka/CFKA, and governance.
Video 4Lumen alignment 4, July 1, 2026Platform capabilities: tasks, dashboards, roles, documents, templates, and AI concepts.
Video 5Lumen Alignment 5, July 1, 2026Transformation roadmap, terminology, SAP, BluePlanet, GLM/3GIS, WFM, Salesforce/NEO.
Video 5.2Lumen 5.2, July 2, 2026Custom Networks, BAU, FT3, LTO PMO, integrations, SiteTracker exit, Kafka 2.0, and phasing.
Video 6Lumen alignment vid 6, July 2, 2026Delivery governance, testing, UAT, integration expertise, terminology, backlog, and readiness.

Action Items Inmediatos De Lumen

  • Decide relative priority and path forward for the Service Delivery module.
  • Decide SiteTracker exit priority, timing, and risk.
  • Finalize roadmap and target execution plan.
  • Prepare content for Concept and Architecture Commit.
  • Define system flow for Network Grooms and next steps.
  • Prioritize follow-up items with clear owners.

Target Architecture Recomendada

The diagram below shows the core recommendation: LumenVision becomes the work surface and orchestration layer, while source-of-truth ownership remains distributed by domain. Kafka/CFKA connects state changes and supports traceability, replay, and exception handling. 

flowchart LR
    subgraph Intake["Demand / Order Intake"]
        SF["Salesforce / NEO"]
        SOM["SOM 2.0 / BlueSteel"]
        EXT["Partner / Portal / API"]
    end

    subgraph WorkSurface["LumenVision / OneVizion"]
        LV["Workflow, Planning, Task Visibility"]
        ADO["AI / ADO
Human-Supervised Recomendacions"]
    end

    subgraph DomainSystems["Authoritative Domain Systems"]
        BPI["BPI
Network Order / Design"]
        BP["BluePlanet / VoltRon
Inventory Direction"]
        GIS["GLM / 3GIS
Site, Route, Survey"]
        SAP["SAP S/4HANA
BOM, Materials, Capital"]
        WFM["WFM / SFS / Flight Deck
Field Execution"]
    end

    subgraph DataLayer["Integration / Data / Reporting"]
        KAFKA["Kafka / CFKA
Events, Headers, Replay, DLQ"]
        HUB["Data Hub
Read-Side Stitched View"]
        RPT["INID / Dashboards
Operational Reporting"]
    end

    EXT --> SF
    SF --> SOM
    SOM --> KAFKA
    KAFKA --> LV
    LV --> BPI
    LV --> WFM
    LV --> SAP
    BPI --> KAFKA
    BP --> KAFKA
    GIS --> KAFKA
    SAP --> KAFKA
    WFM --> KAFKA
    KAFKA --> HUB
    HUB --> LV
    HUB --> RPT
    LV --> ADO
    KAFKA --> ADO
    ADO --> LV

Roadmap Por Etapas

Phase Enfoque Recomendacion
Phase 0 Commit readiness Finalize value statements, context diagram, object ownership matrix, integration inventory, Release 1 scope, and business case.
Phase 1 Foundation release Implement priority workflows with clear object ownership, Kafka/CFKA traceability, task/status sync, and reporting reconciliation.
Phase 2 Migration and exits Use a hybrid approach for SiteTracker, Netbuild, Armor, and Flight Deck/WFMT: deadline-safe migration first, deeper transformation second.
Phase 3 Domain integration depth Expand SAP, BluePlanet, GLM/3GIS, and WFM/SFS write-back only where ownership and rollback/replay behavior are agreed.
Phase 4 AI-assisted operations Start with recommendations, exception handling, and next-best-action support. Move to automation only after governance is proven.

Preguntas Para Cliente

  1. Is the approval request a full architecture submission or a partial concept-to-architecture gate?
  2. Which workflow must be the Release 1 anchor: Service Delivery, SiteTracker exit, Network Grooms, RNI, Waves/Dark Fiber, or another priority?
  3. Which systems must remain authoritative for order, inventory, materials, field task, date, and reporting state?
  4. What minimum integration set is required to prove value by the mid-August decision window?
  1. Is SiteTracker exit primarily deadline-driven migration, target-state transformation, or both?
  2. What value statements will be accepted as enough for STEPn resource approval?
  3. What production-readiness evidence is required: UAT, rollback, replay, observability, support model, or security review?

Detailed Documentos

These links open directly as browser-friendly HTML pages in the same folder or GitHub repository. The Source notes remain in the repo, but colleagues can stay entirely in HTML from this page.

Punto De Vista De Solucion Para Cliente Mejor punto de inicio para una recomendacion customer-facing. Architecture Commit Paquete de Preparacion Short decision-ready brief for your Architecture Commit role. Preguntas Y Diagrama Likely customer questions, objection handling, and architecture explanation. Matriz System-Of-Record Draft object ownership and write-authority matrix. Inventario De Integracion Draft source/target integration list and Release 1 candidates. Outline De Slides Suggested presentation flow and speaking notes. Visual Frame Index Extracted architecture screenshots from the meeting recordings.

Idioma Packages

Mensaje Sugerido Para Cliente

“Our recommendation is to move forward with LumenVision as the structured workflow and orchestration layer, but to make the Architecture Commit precise. We should approve the target architecture principles, Release 1 scope, object ownership, integration contracts, roadmap, and value case. We should not make a blanket source-of-truth claim for every object.”